Saturday, February 20, 2010
The weak economy has brought about a few undeniable realities for authors. Budget cutbacks in publishing mean authors have to promote themselves. Platforms, web presences, self-funded book tours, and blog tours are de rigeur. Bottom line: even if you’re with a big house, you have to get out there and hawk your own wares.
Interestingly, these cutbacks have led to a renaissance in self-publishing. Whereas self-publishing used to carry an undesirable stigma, the current economy finds writers choosing to self-publish for financial profit. I’ve heard writers say that since they’re going to have to do the promotional legwork, they might as well self-publish and keep all the profit. I’ve also heard of writers choosing to self-publish to attract the attention of a big publishing house. And I’ve heard inspiring self-publishing success stories.
Clearly, publishing is changing.
I recently had chance to discuss self-publishing with a college pal, Margie Wirth. Margie is a librarian and yoga instructor living in NYC who just released her first self-published children’s book.
BF: The Carrot Monster was inspired by Margie’s real-life canine companion, Bettyford, a veggie-loving Westie/Poodle mix. In the book, Bettyford’s fictional counterpart grows a garden and lives a gluten-free lifestyle. The book was a collaboration with Margie’s sister, Julie Sherfinski, who created the illustrations. Margie and Julie chose to publish with Lulu.
Margie was gracious enough to answer my questions about her writing and the self-publishing process. I thought I’d share her answers with you.
GI: Describe your process in creating BF: The Carrot Monster. How long did the project take from inception to final copy?
MW: I thought of it. Then I wrote down the scenes that I wanted. I sent the scenes idea to my sister. For example, I said rooftop garden. She just did everything from there. I allowed her to use her artistic, creative mind. It took Julie about six months to draw and color 15 drawings. She did it all free hand.
GI: Why did you choose to self-publish? What benefits have you found in it? Any drawbacks?
MW: It is sort of expensive. You put up the money and there are no guarantees of success or ever earning back what you spent. The profit per book is quite low. I guess we could have peddled the idea to publishing houses, but I thought self-publishing would be the easiest route. If it does become a hit, then maybe some big house will offer us a deal.
GI: Why did you decide to publish with Lulu?
MW: My husband had a friend go through Lulu with good results.
GI: Was Lulu easy to work with?
MW: Yes, my contact was very good.
GI: How long was the turnaround time from your initial contact with Lulu to having books in your hands?
MW: Pretty fast, depends on how many edits you have. I believe you are allowed three free edits once submitting the work. I had some typos in first draft that we did not catch right away.
GI: What were your impressions of the finished product?
MW: I like it. but they [Lulu] really do not do much at all. They did the layout for the cover, but that is it. Everything we submitted was “as is” in the book. They just did the production using saddle stitch binding. They really do not do a lot.
GI: What support does Lulu offer to help you market your book?
MW: Not a lot. It will be on Amazon and Baker and Taylor. You select the package.
GI: What kinds of things are you doing on your own to market the book?
MW: Veggies and gardening with kids is very popular today thanks in part to Michelle Obama. We are sending one to the White House, to Oprah, Katie Couric, Elisabeth Hasselback (In the book, the dog is gluten free; I am gluten-free and so is Elisabeth Hasselback.) I am sending one to the Betty Ford Foundation. I am giving one to Mt. Mary [College], to a librarian I know at Milwaukee Public Library and probably a few [to other public and school libraries].
GI: What was the most satisfying part of the process for you?
MW: I would say either holding the first copy or, better yet, actually making some sales.
GI: What have you learned from the process? What would you do differently next time?
MW: I am not sure yet if I would do anything differently. I will have a better answer in six months.
GI: Speaking of next time, do you plan to write more books in the future?
MW: That all depends on the success of the first book.
GI: Last but not least, how does Bettyford like being a celebrity?
MW: She has always believed that she is a former first lady.
Anyone interested in purchasing a copy of BF: The Carrot Monster can order online from Lulu at:
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
Today, I'm posting an update from Jane Banning. Many of you will know her as "Carmen" from my recent post on plagiarism. Jane has done a tremendous job of battling her plagiarist. I thought we'd all benefit from seeing what she's done. Her story is full of valuable lessons to us all.
If you're interested in reading Jane's rightfully published work, you can find it across the internet. A Google search should help you find it. Jane also has several pieces published in the 30 Days, 30 Writes chapbook. Use the link at right to navigate to a pdf copy.
Now to Jane's update:
Since the last post, several things have happened.
-The person has agreed to try to find all the sites where the poem was sent and posted. This is a very good thing. He isn’t blocking me on it. To help this along, I have set a Google alert for his name and the title, so I get notified any time either appears. Then I make sure to follow up with the editor, forwarding the original email I sent to this person, which has my poem. Thank goodness for the brilliance of the ‘sent’ box. Thank goodness I keep all my correspondence about my writing.
-Every editor, all six of them, have agreed to take the poem down. Many of them have expressed disappointment, shame, or disbelief. A couple of them have added multiple exclamation marks to their replies.
-For my part, I’m much more cautious about sending work out. Several people have commented that while critique is always helpful, I should trust my instincts and my abilities. I’m listening.
-I do not believe that this episode is a form of flattery. I do believe it is – not ill will against me personally – but the result of cavalier indifference, inattention, laziness, and carelessness. I suppose I could go all out with a lawsuit or injunction. I could turn from trust to bitterness. But I’m not made that way. If this poem does need a lawsuit, I’ll get it one. In the meantime, I’m moving forward, writing, and keeping on.
Thank you to everyone who commented on the post; your support means more than you can know.
Monday, February 15, 2010
I'm honored to announce that writing pal, Linda Simoni-Wastila, has graced me with the Honest Scrap award. Linda's a talented writer and gentle soul whom it's been my privelege to learn with and from these past few years. To claim my prize, I need to reveal ten things about myself. Here's a few random things that you may not know.
1. I’ve been writing since I was 6 years old, when I wrote my first short story.
2. I have no patience for people who constantly complain, but do nothing to change their circumstances.
3. I love to learn new things whenever I can.
4. I’m desperately math impaired.
5. I have a pot of Italian wedding soup on the stove RIGHT NOW.
6. I believe hard work is the key to success.
7. I have been blessed with the best husband and daughter a woman could hope for.
8. I adore oatmeal raisin cookies.
9. I’m tripping around the house as I try to get used to my new glasses with progressive lenses.
10. We have three cats who rule the roost. No pedigreed purebreds. I like mutts.
Now for the fun part: I get to pass this award on. Here are three great writers who really deserve to be recognized for their honesty, hard work and integrity.
JC TOWLER: You ALWAYS tells it like it is.
STEPHEN BOOK: Your honesty has helped me grow by leaps and bounds.
JANE BANNING: You approach everything from a place of honesty. Honest images, honest opinions, honest dealings.
One last note: speaking of honesty, check back tomorrow for a follow-up to my blog post on Carmen's work being stolen. Carmen, aka Jane, will be stop by tomorrow to share the latest on her battle with a plagiarist.
Monday, February 8, 2010
Last week, writing pal Carmen (not her real name) was surveying updates from her Facebook pals when she discovered a posting by a fellow writer she’d grown chummy with.
Let’s call him “Dirty Conniving Creep.”
Carmen was stunned to see that DCC had just published a poem that bore a startling similarity--key phrases and all--to a work she’d emailed to him for feedback not so long ago.
Horrified, Carmen followed DCC’s link and discovered that, yes indeed, DCC had plagiarized her work.
The next few days were a nightmare for Carmen. When she contacted DCC, he gave her the cockamamie excuse that, when surveying the elaborate web of his computer files, he couldn’t keep track of what was his work and what had been written by others. Not only that, but he could no longer recall all the publications to which he’d submitted Carmen’s poem.
Carmen got down to business. An internet search revealed DCC had published her poem in multiple publications. She emailed the editors to explain the situation. She included a trail of the emails she’d originally exchanged with DCC, proving her work had been pilfered.
The editors responded immediately, horrified and angry. They pulled the plagiarized work from their publications. Carmen felt better, but not healed. She was offended and hurt on many levels. As her friend, I was offended on her behalf. She still feels gun shy about sharing her work with other writers.
In honor of Carmen and all she’s been through, I decided to share with you the top 5 reasons I despise plagiarism. They are:
1) Plagiarism steals more than just a writer’s words.
Carmen’s poem was a lovely piece about a mother’s loss when her child grows up. DCC not only stole the words she’d used to express that, he stole the beautiful, universal and tender emotion Carmen felt for her grown son and called it his own. Since DCC is a parasite, I doubt he’d begin to understand such a noble feeling. He isn’t decent enough to claim it.
2) Plagiarism makes editors suspicious of innocent writers.
I’d bet money that the numerous editors Carmen contacted are embarrassed by publishing this fraud. No one likes being embarrassed. I’m sure they’ll be skeptical of work coming over their transom for a long time to come. That hurts hard working, honest writers like you and me.
3) Plagiarism robs authors of the right to publish their own work.
Now that Carmen’s work has been published, she can no longer viably publish it under her own byline. ‘Nuff said.
4) Plagiarism makes writers suspicious of one another.
As writers, we often operate in a fog of creative innocence. We never imagine something like this will happen. But Carmen is nervous now. So am I. I’ll be more cautious now about sharing my unpublished work. This saddens me. I always enjoyed putting my work out there for feedback. But I’m grateful for the trustworthy peers I’ve already found.
5) Plagiarism is the worst kind of grubby, back-stabbing behavior a writer can exhibit.
As far as I’m concerned, anyone stealing someone else’s work has no right to call themselves a writer. Writers create. Plagiarists steal. That’s not the same thing at all.